Movie reviews

The Borderlands: keep the other person in view

The head cameras need the investigators to look at each other. Their companionship gives The Borderlands something more valuable to lose than a reliable recording.

Whimsical Woes editorial ·

A camera attached to a person has a practical limitation: it cannot keep another face in view unless its wearer looks that way. The Borderlands makes that constraint unexpectedly useful. Looking at somebody becomes part of the film's construction, giving its investigation a human attachment before the fear takes hold.

Elliot Goldner's film sends Vatican investigators to a remote church to assess reports of unusual happenings. Gordon Kennedy and Robin Hill play Deacon and Gray. The recording equipment belongs to that inquiry, but the people using it supply the more rewarding reason to pay attention. The possibility that something might happen matters more once there is company worth spending time with.

Somebody has to look back

Kennedy explained the head-camera problem in his Filmuforia interview: looking up or down could leave the other performer out of the picture. The actors had to attend to one another within the technical arrangement. That gives an apparently casual format a precise demand. A face in this kind of frame is the result of someone's attention. The device carries a relationship along with whatever evidence it records.

The companionship also had room to develop. In the HMZ Film group interview, Hill and Kennedy describe the freedom to improvise and how well they worked together. Hill places that freedom inside the scenes' existing structure. This matters: the warmth need not arrive as a separate speech announcing friendship. It can accumulate through the pleasure of watching people find ways to occupy the same task.

Producer Jennifer Handorf told Blueprint: Review that the leads proved funnier than expected, prompting additional scenes to make the dark turn feel less abrupt. She specifically names the pub scene as an addition. The edit had to account for the people the performances produced. That is an appealing production choice: ordinary company is allowed to affect the shape of the horror, rather than existing only as disposable padding before it.

The joke has somebody to happen to

Hill described Gray as a funny person caught in frightening circumstances, with the jokes falling away as he becomes genuinely scared. That progression gives humor a character to belong to. The important change is what the person can still manage. A joke can be an ordinary way of dealing with a job, then become something its speaker no longer has available. Its absence can carry weight.

Goldner's HeyUGuys interview makes another useful distinction: the audience can suspect danger before the characters accept it. That leaves the companionship doing work even when the mystery is no longer evenly shared. We can worry about how people will respond to what seems increasingly likely. A horror film does not have to keep everyone equally uninformed to keep its relationships interesting.

There are limits to the bargain. Viewers wanting an immediately severe religious horror film may find the early levity distracting. Others may lose patience with the distance between suspecting trouble and watching the investigators accommodate it. Neither response is unreasonable. The slow accumulation earns its place only while the people remain worth following; a camera format alone cannot make waiting feel consequential.

For an image-maker, the useful thought is simple: decide who must look at whom for a picture to exist. That choice can express concern, irritation, dependence, or an effort to stay together. The Borderlands gives a recording setup that additional burden. The prospect of losing sight of someone becomes meaningful because looking at them has already been a way of keeping them company.

Questions from the crypt

Are The Borderlands and Final Prayer the same film?

Yes. Second Sight identifies both titles together, and the US Lionsgate listing uses Final Prayer. The original film was already screening in 2013; a listing's later release year does not make it a different production.

Is The Borderlands presented as a real documentary?

It uses a found-footage form, but Goldner explicitly describes it as fiction rather than an attempt to convince viewers the recording is real. Its investigators and reported supernatural events belong to the story.

Is The Borderlands a comedy or a horror film?

The humor is part of its characters' company, not a promise that the danger stays light. Hill describes Gray becoming less jokey as fear takes over. Expect a tonal progression rather than uninterrupted comic relief.

Sources & further reading

Keep reading