Movie reviews

Let's Scare Jessica to Death: the dead don't stay on the paper

John Hancock makes a collection of grave rubbings part of a room that will not stay quiet. Jessica's uncertainty becomes a problem of listening as much as looking.

Whimsical Woes editorial ·

A grave rubbing ought to be a manageable encounter with the dead: an inscription you can carry home. Let's Scare Jessica to Death makes preservation an intimate source of fear. Jessica's rubbings begin to whisper. Her room acquires company through something she chose to keep.

John Hancock's 1971 film follows Jessica, played by Zohra Lampert, from psychiatric care to a farmhouse and orchard with her husband Duncan and their friend Woody. Duncan has committed their savings to this new start. Emily, a stranger already staying in the house, makes hospitality another demand on a woman trying to keep her footing.

Jessica's voice-over shares the soundtrack with the voices troubling her. Hearing someone's account usually promises access and understanding. Here, listening brings us closer without settling where every sound belongs. We hear her trying to interpret what happens alongside the material that makes interpretation difficult. Intimacy offers no guarantee of clarity.

Jessica withholds an early disturbing experience because she fears Duncan and Woody will think her illness has returned. Silence becomes a decision with a cost. An encounter requires two assessments: what might it mean, and what might reporting it make other people think of her? The second question complicates the first.

A picture of a name becomes company

The rubbings make uncertainty tangible. They begin as records of an encounter: a surface taken from the cemetery and kept. Once they join the sound of a room, collecting a trace becomes uncomfortably close to inviting a presence. Paper needs little alteration to frighten someone who already cares about what it holds.

Hancock recalled his family's apple farm and equipment shed through a child's eyes. That association offers a way into Jessica's setting. A farm contains practical adult plans and things a child cannot comfortably interpret. Her retreat carries both possibilities: somewhere to build a life, somewhere ordinary surroundings become difficult to read.

Listen without turning her into an answer key

The psychiatric premise also carries a risk. A viewer can use Jessica's history as a shortcut that dismisses every uncertain event. The film becomes more rewarding when her attempt to make sense of things remains worth attending to, whatever explanation one favors. Its ambiguity deserves scrutiny, too: withholding an answer is valuable only while the competing possibilities keep changing our relationship with her experience.

Anyone wanting a brisk investigation or a tidy supernatural rulebook may find the repeated uncertainty wearing. Its intimate scale asks for patience. The reward is a horror film that gives a personal collection a disturbing second function. For an artist, there is something useful in that modest choice: let an object acquire a purpose and an owner before asking it to misbehave. A quiet piece of paper can then make the whole room feel less private.

Questions from the crypt

Is Let's Scare Jessica to Death a vampire film or psychological horror?

It uses vampire imagery alongside Jessica's uncertain perceptions and fear of being disbelieved. Both are important to its Gothic suspense; this review leaves the ending and the final interpretation open.

What are Jessica's grave rubbings?

They are pencil impressions from tombstones. Jessica's collection brings traces of the cemetery into her private space, connecting preservation with the film's unsettling sounds.

What connects the film to The Turn of the Screw?

Hancock named Henry James's story as an influence on a woman's uncertainty about frightening events. Expect a connection in perspective, rather than the same plot.

Sources & further reading

Keep reading