Lost Hearts: kindness with an inventory attached

Spoilers follow, including the explanation of the haunting. Lost Hearts is a story about a child receiving what looks like extraordinary good luck: a home offered by a wealthy relative. Its most unpleasant idea is that the offer can be both carefully planned and fundamentally without care. Someone has thought about the child a great deal. That is the problem.

Stephen Elliott arrives at Aswarby Hall as an orphan. Mr Abney’s welcome includes repeated questions about his age. At first, the repetition might pass for awkward adult conversation. Once the story reveals Abney’s intentions, that same detail becomes a measurement. James does not have to replace the scene with a sinister version; the original words already contain one.

The household supplies its own reassurance

Mrs Bunch’s account of earlier children presents Abney as generous. Their disappearances receive explanations that preserve that reputation. The lingering hurdy-gurdy matters because an object complicates the convenient account of a boy simply leaving. A possession can be quieter evidence than a witness and harder to fit into the household’s preferred story.

The assumptions about foreignness and Romani identity in this conversation deserve attention rather than affectionate repetition. They help make certain children easier for the household to explain away. A modern reading can notice that mechanism without endorsing the stereotypes. The ghost story is operating inside a social arrangement that already knows whose absence it can tolerate.

That gives the later apparitions a terrible purpose beyond frightening Stephen. The vanished children cease to be a pair of comfortable anecdotes about charity. Their damaged bodies insist that something happened to particular people. The evidence has become impossible to tidy up with a story about wandering away.

The document is worse than the apparition

Abney’s papers supply an account of his attempted occult project. What makes the passage vicious is its management of vocabulary. He objects to the moral terms that would describe his conduct while calmly outlining it. His scholarly manner is not a barrier against cruelty. It is a way of making cruelty sound like a category error committed by less sophisticated people.

The ghosts are visually horrible, but the living man’s explanation is the more complete portrait of a monster. That contrast keeps the story from becoming only a series of signs leading to a secret. The secret has a voice, and the voice is deeply pleased with its own qualifications.

There is a cost to making the explanation so explicit. Readers who prefer a haunting to retain uncertain edges may find the closing document overdetermined. It tells us how the parts fit. Yet that bluntness also denies Abney the refuge of mystique. He does not become impressive because his interests are obscure.

What remains after the reveal

The story contains violence toward children and disturbing bodily imagery; its brevity should not be confused with mildness. Its strongest recommendation is for readers interested in the distance between benevolent appearances and actual obligations to another person.

For a writer, the opening age questions are the lesson to keep. A clue can begin as a plausible social habit and end as evidence without changing a word. Build a scene that survives both readings. Lost Hearts makes hospitality frightening because the welcome is sincere about wanting the child there, while being dishonest about why.

Questions from the crypt

Sources & further reading

• M. R. James: Lost Hearts in Ghost Stories of an Antiquary

Keep reading

• canon alberics scrap book review
• the mezzotint mr james review