Game reviews

Neverending Nightmares: the shadows refuse to sit still

A room can look like a finished ink drawing and still change its mind. Neverending Nightmares makes moving hatching and repeated awakenings do related kinds of work.

Whimsical Woes editorial ·

A finished ink drawing usually has the courtesy to hold still. Neverending Nightmares takes away that courtesy. It gives a familiar visual surface to a story in which Thomas can wake up and still be dreaming. The design has an excellent way to make that uncertainty felt before anybody explains it: the marks that tell you where the dark begins can move.

Infinitap Games released the original in 2014. Its premise sends Thomas through layered nightmares, with threats to avoid instead of enemies he can simply defeat. This review considers the design across that original setup and Matt Gilgenbach’s descriptions of the 2016 PlayStation edition. Its account of clearer branching points applies to the later edition.

The hatching is allowed to move

Gilgenbach describes a lighting system that draws more or fewer lines across dark areas. Those lines animate. That makes an old-fashioned looking image do something a printed page cannot: change the density of marks as part of the space you are moving through. It is an excellent choice because the picture retains the character of a drawing while its boundaries stop feeling settled.

For someone making horror art, the lesson is to decide what the texture is doing before polishing it. A dense patch can make a place look worn. Here, changing that density can make a place feel as though it has moved closer. It would be easy to admire the pen work and miss that more interesting job. The drawing is taking part in the uncertainty rather than illustrating it after the fact.

Getting away buys you time

In the PlayStation release post, Gilgenbach explains that Thomas cannot sustain a long run before needing to catch his breath. That puts a limit on the comfort of simply moving faster. The mechanic works as a small dramatic choice: a retreat can make you feel briefly decisive without making the next stretch safe. A player who wants combat mastery to pay off in a lasting sense of control has reason to find that arrangement frustrating.

Repeated awakenings have their own limit. A reset can undo a player’s confidence; a steady rhythm can make the next one easy to predict. Gilgenbach describes making branch points easier to find on PlayStation. That can help someone discover more of the fiction while leaving the story’s uncertainty intact.

The strongest idea here is how little final authority the act of waking carries. The art can look firmly drawn and still refuse to give Thomas a reliable border between safety and danger. That is a more particular pleasure than a promise to frighten everyone. It is also why a player looking for a reassuring explanation should take the game’s bleakness seriously.

Questions from the crypt

What edition does this review cover?

The game debuted in 2014. The review discusses the shared nightmare and drawing design, and identifies clearer branch access as a change Gilgenbach described for the 2016 PlayStation versions. It does not compare current ports or hardware performance.

Can Thomas fight his way out?

Evasion is the core setup. The developer describes hiding and fleeing as central, and Thomas’s limited sprint in the PlayStation edition makes distance temporary. This is not a combat guide or an account of particular enemy encounters.

Does the story document the developer’s life?

No. Gilgenbach describes a fictional story that expresses feelings drawn from his own experience. The game contains disturbing self-harm imagery. The review avoids depicting it or treating one artist’s account as universal.

Sources & further reading

Keep reading