The Shadows on the Wall: the house refuses to keep quiet

Before the shadow becomes a problem, talking is already difficult. The sisters in Mary E. Wilkins Freeman’s The Shadows on the Wall weigh what they heard, what they suspect, and whether anyone should say it aloud. The haunting enters a household with a functioning system for avoiding an answer. Its chief disruption is that it refuses to cooperate.

Edward Glynn has died after an argument with his brother Henry. Their sisters discuss the circumstances in a room where doors and overhearing matter. Freeman does not need a remote castle. The ordinary question of who might hear a sentence makes the home feel divided into dangerous zones.

A right to stay is not the same as being welcome

The quarrel concerns Edward’s place in the family home. The sisters explain that their father’s will provided for the children to live there, with money for their support. Henry’s resentment therefore should not be accepted as a neutral account of Edward imposing on him. The story distinguishes a person’s right to occupy space from somebody else’s wish to control it.

That distinction gives the later shadow an unusually concrete force. It resembles a claim that cannot be evicted by disapproval. You do not need to turn the story into a legal allegory to notice how its supernatural image returns attention to the argument over who belongs in the room.

It also complicates the sisters’ evasions. They can identify Edward’s entitlement and still struggle to challenge the person who resents it. Understanding an injustice does not automatically supply the freedom or confidence to confront it. Freeman makes that gap audible in the interrupted questions.

The room becomes an experiment

Once the shadow is noticed, furniture and lamps become possible explanations. Moving things is a sensible response to an unexpected shape on a wall. The unsettling turn comes when failed explanations do not produce greater openness. They produce more insistence that the explanation must already be correct.

Henry’s attempt to probe the space with a sword is especially revealing. He treats the air as something that can be systematically searched and threatened into compliance. The action externalizes a habit of control: if the room will not confirm his account, perhaps enough force will make it do so.

For an illustrator, this is a useful alternative to making the ghost itself more elaborate. Keep the impossible shape still. Put the movement into the people and objects around it. A fixed image becomes disturbing through the amount of ordinary effort spent trying to alter or explain it.

Silence has several motives

The sisters should not be flattened into identical frightened witnesses. Their different ways of questioning, retreating, and asserting calm create the story’s pressure. A claim that nothing is wrong can mean conviction, fear of what might be true, or an attempt to manage somebody else’s reaction. Similar words do different work depending on who says them.

This review leaves the final development undescribed. The story’s early suspicions are strong enough that some readers may find its direction less surprising than its execution. Its appeal lies in the persistence of the image and the social labor of denying it, rather than an elaborate hidden mythology.

Read it alongside The Eyes to compare two rooms where people listen uneasily to explanations. Wharton lets a storyteller occupy the room with his account; Freeman gives the wall something that account cannot comfortably absorb. Sometimes a ghost needs no speech. Everybody else’s efforts to avoid speaking will do.

Questions from the crypt

Sources & further reading

• Project Gutenberg: The Shadows on the Wall, primary text

Keep reading

• the eyes edith wharton review
• the mezzotint mr james review