Possum: the face that refuses to perform

A puppet usually offers somebody a way to perform. Possum makes that promise feel broken. Its central object is horribly elaborate, yet its face offers little of the expressive cooperation that makes a puppet seem like company. There is an artist's nightmare in that arrangement: having made something that cannot give back the response you need.

Matthew Holness's 2018 film follows Philip, a disgraced puppeteer played by Sean Harris, returning to his childhood home with the puppet. The British Council's film record describes his failed attempts to destroy it and the resurfacing of traumatic memories. Those are the premise's boundaries, rather than an invitation to diagnose a character from a collection of unsettling images.

Less expression, more trouble

Holness told HeyUGuys that an early head design was too expressive. The replacement was an unemotive sculpt based on Harris's face. That change is a useful rebuke to the instinct to keep adding signs of wickedness. An obvious threatening expression would supply an attitude. A face that withholds one leaves the person looking at it with more work, and considerably less reassurance.

The body required anything but minimal effort. Odd Studios' Adam Johansen describes eight thin articulated legs, a body and head operated by hand, and the need for multiple puppeteers. He also distinguishes the studio's original head from the replacement made in the UK. Credit matters here: the finished creature emerged through separate decisions, not one instantly perfect monster drawing.

That contrast gives the design its particular discomfort. The mechanism promises animation, while the face refuses an easily readable social response. For a drawing exercise, try giving an elaborate creature a neutral face before reaching for the teeth. The challenge is whether posture, proportion, and the relationship between parts can carry the unease. An angry eyebrow should not have to do everybody's job.

A voice is not an easy escape

In his Film4 interview, Holness explains that old Radiophonic Workshop recordings were initially used during editing; the group subsequently supplied music and sound design. He describes sound helping express Philip's state of mind. That gives the score a purpose beyond decorating the film with a familiar kind of creepiness. It can carry pressure that ordinary conversation fails to release.

Holness also describes the project in relation to silent horror and a protagonist who struggles to speak. The comparison helps explain its uncomfortable bargain. The film asks for attention without promising a welcoming guide through it. Philip's difficulty communicating is part of the construction, rather than a pause while we wait for a more entertaining character to take over.

The limitation follows: repetition can feel static. Viewers wanting conversational momentum or frequent revelations may find this an exhausting invitation to keep looking.

Its value is in making expression difficult without treating difficulty itself as proof of profundity. The story gives failed communication a physical presence. There is no need to turn that tension into a neat clinical label for it to be frightening.

Questions from the crypt

Sources & further reading

• British Council UK Films Database: Possum
• HeyUGuys: Matthew Holness on Possum
• HeyUGuys: Odd Studios' Adam Johansen on the creature design
• Film4: interview with Matthew Holness

Keep reading

• lets scare jessica 1971 grave rubbings review
• dead of night 1945 anthology conversation review